- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 March 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1505/2022
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner asserts that the order passed by this Court is being breached.
¶2The contemnor through his counsel categorically states that he has stopped the operation of the brick kiln and that he is not operating the same as on date.
¶3I make it clear that it is open to the petitioner to intimate this Court directly if this Court's order is being breached. After getting information, spot inspection will be conducted immediately thereafter and if this Court finds that the contemnor has violated the undertaking given before this Court, consequence will be very severe. The Contempt Petition is disposed of on the above lines.
21.03.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi in W.P.(MD)No.13206 of 2022
21.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in W.P.(MD)No.13206 of 2022 Samiraj ... Petitioner Vs. Sekar ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / respondent for willful disobeyance to the order of this Court dated 10.08.2022 in W.P.(MD)No. 13206 of 2022 and punish contemnor for contempt. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah For Respondent : Mr.K.Mahendran
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.