VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ramanathan P v. The Tahsildar

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 November 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 22174/2021

Judgment

O R D E R The Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

30.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To

1.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District.

2.The Surveyor, Town Survey Office, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District. N.ANAND VENKATESH, J tsg

30.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH P.Ramanathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District. 2.The Surveyor, Town Survey Office, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District. 3.Thahoor Ravindirapandiyan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's application dated 12.11.2021 given for survey of his patta land comprised in Survey Nos. 114/2, 137/2, 137/3 138/6A, 139/1A, 139/2B, 157/3B2 and 199/14 in uppukottai Village, Bodinayakanur, Theni District and to fix the boundaries within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gandhi For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.A.K.Manikkam, Special Government Pleader For R-3 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.