VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Subbiah Pandian, v. The Superintending Engineer

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6736/2017

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

14.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Superintending Engineer, Wind Farm Project,

¶2The Superintending Engineer, Tirunelveli Electricity Circle, Maharaja Nagar,

¶3The Executive Engineer, Wind Farm Project,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶4The Executive Engineer, (Rural),

¶5Suzlon Gujara Wind Park Limited, Rep. by its Manager, Iyyakutty, S/o.Nambi Jeevanantham, Door No.85/1B, Plot No.123, 20th Cross Street, Balabackiya Nagar, Tiruneveli Junction.

14.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.5287 of 2017 Subbiah Pandian ... Petitioner versus 1. The Superintending Engineer, Wind Farm Project, 2. The Superintending Engineer, Tirunelveli Electricity Circle, Maharaja Nagar, 3. The Executive Engineer, Wind Farm Project, 4. The Executive Engineer, (Rural), 5. Suzlon Gujara Wind Park Limited, Rep. by its Manager, Iyyakutty, S/o.Nambi Jeevanantham, Door No.85/1B, Plot No.123, 20th Cross Street, Balabackiya Nagar, Tiruneveli Junction. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 4 herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.02.2017 objecting to provide electricity connection to the 5th respondent "Wind Mill", in the petitioner's land in Patta No. 953, Muthammalpuram Village, V.K.Pudur Taluk, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.J.C.Rathinavel Pandian For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel For R5 : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.