VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.Palaniraju v. The Director of Elementary

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10267/2016

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has challenged the transfer order in this Writ Petition which would be granted in rotation to serve in the hilly region. Due to efflux of time, the claim of the petitioner cannot be considered. Moreover, the petitioner is promoted as District Educational Officer. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication as on date. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

12.06.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The Director of Elementary Education, Office of the Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai.

2.The District Elementary Education Officer, District Elementary Educational Officer, Theni.

3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Assistant Elementary Education Office, Bodinaickanur, Theni District.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

12.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.8021 and 8022 of 2016 V.Palaniraju ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Elementary Education, Office of the Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai. 2.The District Elementary Education Officer, District Elementary Educational Officer, Theni. 3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Assistant Elementary Education Office, Bodinaickanur, Theni District. 4.V.Karpagam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of transfer in Na.Ka.No.2022/A2/2015, dated 18.04.2016 on the file of the Respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karthik, For M/s.Lajapathi Roy and Associates. For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.V.Omprakash, Government Advocate.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.