VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Mary Augestinal, v. The District Elementary

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 June 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10324/2016

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner has questioned her termination from the 3rd respondent School with a direction to other respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in the 3rd respondent School with monetary benefits.

2.It is seen from the records that the 3rd respondent School comes under Diocese, Kanyakumari. It is a private aided minority institution. The appointments in the private aided minority institution is within the domain of the institution. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

3.Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No

21.06.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg To

1.The District Elementary Educational Officer,

2.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Karungal, Kanyakumari District. S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg

21.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD)No.8073 of 2016 P.Mary Augestinal ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Elementary Educational Officer, 2.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Karungal, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Correspondent, Emilin Memorial Nursery and Primary School, CSI Kanjirapuram, Kanjiracode Post, 4.J.Jhansi Selvakumari, Headmistress, Emilin Memorial Nursery and Primary School, CSI Kanjirapuram, Kanjiracode Post, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent herein proceedings no.Nil, dated 22.04.2016, to quash the same and further, to direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner herein to continue in service in the 3rd respondent School with all monetary benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.E.V.N.Siva For R1 and 2 : Mr.V.Omprakash Government Advocate For R3 and 4 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.