- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10381/2016
Judgment
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the petitioners making necessary payments to the respondent bank.
¶2By taking note of these developments, W.P. (MD) No.10381 of 2016 is disposed of without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
24.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.10381 of 2016
24.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.10381 of 2016 and W.M.P. (MD) Nos.8098 and 8099 of 2016 1. M/s.Oxford Engineering College, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Trustee M.Subramanian, Piratiyur West, Karumandapam, Trichy District. 2.Nirmala ... Petitioners Vs. State Bank of India, Rep. by its Assistant General Manager, RASMEC CC, SARC Wing, Zonal Office, Mc Donald Road, Trichy 620 001. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certioarri, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice issued by the respondent dated 21.05.2015, quash the same. For Petitioner :Ms.J.Anandhavalli For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.