S.Viknesh v. The Tahsildar

ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that his application for issuance of patta in his name has not been considered by the first respondent. Therefore, he filed this writ petition in the year 2017 for a Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue patta in his name.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submits that based on the petitioner's application, enquiry has been contemplated by the first respondent and the same has been concluded, however, no order has been passed.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that the second respondent is equipped with the sale deed dated

13.07.2008.

¶4In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader that enquiry has been contemplated by the first respondent and the same has been concluded, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

09.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

09.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Viknesh ... Petitioner versus 1. The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 2. M.Palanikumar ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to issue patta in the petitioner's name in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.90/5 situated at Ponnamangalam Village, Checkanoorani Sub Registrar's Office, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Santhakumaresan For R1 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Govt. Pleader For R2 : Mr.R.Aravindan