S.Manickam v. The Commissioner

ORDER The petitioner has sought certain information under Right to Information Act and has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider his representation dated

03.12.2016.

¶2There is no representation for the petitioner.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that the representation filed by the petitioner by way of an appeal was disposed of by the Commission on 25.07.2017.

¶4Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent, this writ petition is closed as no further order is required. No costs.

09.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. To

¶1The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Right to Information Commission, Chennai – 600 011.

¶2The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Right to Information Officer (Appellate Authority), Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶3The Deputy Registrar, Right to Information Officer, Co-operative Societies, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

09.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Manickam ... Petitioner versus 1. The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Right to Information Commission, Chennai – 600 011. 2. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Right to Information Officer (Appellate Authority), Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3. The Deputy Registrar, Right to Information Officer, Co-operative Societies, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent herein to consider and pass order on the petitioner's representation dated 03.12.2016. For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : Mr.K.K.Senthil For R2 and R3 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Govt. Pleader