VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Ameer Abbas Manthiry v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
M. Sundar, R.Sakthivel
Case no.
HCP(MD) 1129/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.] Captioned 'Habeas Corpus Petition' ['HCP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed in this Court on 01.09.2023.

¶2Captioned HCP was listed in the Admission Board on

11.09.2023 and another Hon'ble Coordinate Division Bench made the following order:

¶3We now deem it appropriate to narrate short facts. Short facts are that HCP petitioner's daughter ['A.Thahirah, aged 21 years (Date of Birth 14.04.2002)' who shall hereinafter be referred to as 'absentee' for Page No.2 of 6 the sake of convenience] is missing from 26.07.2023; that the third respondent has taken away the absentee on 26.07.2023; that captioned HCP is predicated on the fear of the HCP petitioner that absentee may be in illegal detention/unlawful custody of third respondent (to be noted, third respondent is a private respondent and his age is 39 years).

¶4Today, Mr.A.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel for HCP petitioner and Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for official respondents (respondents 1 and 2) are before us.

¶5Learned Prosecutor submits that pursuant to the complaint preferred by the HCP petitioner on 26.07.2023, investigation was kick-started and investigation by the second respondent has brought to light the following facts:

(a) The absentee has left home on her own volition, voluntarily and has not been forcibly taken away by the third respondent;

(b) the absentee has married the third respondent and the same has been registered on 29.03.2023 on the file of Thallakulam Sub-Registrar's Office;

(c) the absentee wants to continue the marital tie with the third respondent; Page No.3 of 6

(d) the HCP petitioner/complainant was informed the complainant came over to police station i.e., Melur Police Station and inter alia the following proceedings: Page No.4 of 6 The aforementioned proceedings have been received and signed by the HCP petitioner.

¶6Aforementioned proceedings are telltale and brings to light that this is not a case of illegal detention or unlawful custody. Therefore, we drop the curtains of the captioned HCP.

¶7Captioned HCP disposed of as closed. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (R.S.V., J.)

09.11.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No PKN To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District,

¶2The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai Page No.5 of 6 H.C.P(MD)No.1129oofo2023 M.SUNDAR,oJ. and R.SAKTHIVEL,oJ. PKN ORDERoMADEoIN H.C.P(MD)No.1129oofo2023

09.11.2023 PageoNo.6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL A.Ameer Abbas Manthiry ... Petitioner/ Father of Detenue vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, 2. The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District. 3. B.Nijaar Ahemed ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, against the respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter A.Thahirah, aged 21 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor Page No.1 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.