R.Vinoth v. The Additional Chief

ORDER In an earlier occasion, there was no representation on the side of the Writ Petitioner. Since the petitioner has not represented either by Counsel or by himself to prosecute the matter, this case was posted today (i.e. 07.06.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also the petitioner is not represented by his Counsel and he is not present in person, which shows that the Writ Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Petition.

¶2Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. In case, if the petitioner is seeking to restore the same, may be allowed on Costs of Rs.1,000/-payable to Legal Service Authority, Madurai Bench. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No

07.06.2023 Internet : Yes

ksa To

1.The Additional Chief Educational Officer, Department of School Education, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶2The District Educational Officer & Enquiry Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 11161 of 2016

07.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 11161 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No. 8578 of 2016 R.Vinoth ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Chief Educational Officer, Department of School Education, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The District Educational Officer & Enquiry Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Project Director, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the termination order dated 18.03.2016 in Na.Ka.No. 1056/A2/AKE/2014 on the file of the Respondent 1 and quash the same. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Omprakash Government Advocate