VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Muthu, S/O.Kasi v. The Tahsildar

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11399/2016

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner filed this writ petition for a mandamus forbearing the respondents from measuring the land situated in S.Nos.35/1B, 36/1 situated at Udapanpatti Village, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

2.Learned Government Advocate, based on the written instructions received from the first respondent, submitted that the lands have already been surveyed and sub-divisions have also been carried out.

3.It appears that there is no interim order in this writ petition and the respondents have already measured and sub-divided the properties. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and the same is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index :

20.06.2023 NCC : gk To

1.The Tahsildar, Devakottai Taluk, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Taluk Surveyor, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

20.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.8722 of 2016 K.Muthu ... Petitioner v. 1.The Tahsildar, Devakottai Taluk, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Taluk Surveyor, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.Vellaisamy ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the second respondent from measuring the land in S.Nos.35/1B, 36/1 situated at Udapanpatti Village, Sirumaruthur Group, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.06.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeyaprakash For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam, Government Advocate for R.1 & R.2 No appearance for R.3 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.