- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 April 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1173/2016
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents submitted that pending writ petition the petitioner's appointment was approved, since the petitioner is possessing TET qualification. The submissions are recorded.
¶2In view of the aforesaid submissions, nothing survives for adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No
03.04.2023 Internet : Yes
ksa To
1.The Government of Tamilnadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai.
¶2The Director of School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai.
¶3The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli Education District, Tirunelveli.
¶4The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Keezhapavvor Region, Pavoorchatraam, S.SRIMATHY, J ksa
03.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P(MD)No. 969 of 2016 M.Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamilnadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2. The Director of School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai. 3. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli Education District, Tirunelveli. 4. The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Keezhapavvor Region, Pavoorchatraam, 5. The Correspondent, Anna Primary School, V.K.Puthur, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pursuant to the impugned rejection order passed by the 4th respondent Omu.No.1421/AA1/2015 dated 30.12.2015 quash the same consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to approve the petitioner's appointment as Secondary Grade Teacher at 5th respondent school and give all other service and monetary benefit from 01.07.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chellapandian For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.V.Omprakash, Government Advocate For R-5 : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.