S.Ponraj, v. The Managing Director

O R D E R At the hearing on 13.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.11753 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.

(MD).Nos.9029 and 9030 of 2016 are closed.

20.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., 11/12, Mangadusamy Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 34.

2.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., District Collectorate, Thoothukudi District. W.P.(Mi)No.11753oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.11753oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.9029o&o9030oofo2016

20.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :20.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.9029 & 9030 of 2016 S.Pomraj M/s.Santhakumar Agencies and Cable TV, LCO.No.24405, Paramakudichi, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., 11/12, Mangadusamy Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 34. 2.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., District Collectorate, Thoothukudi District. 3.P.Suresan ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings number D14/11688/2014 dated 25.05.2015 and quash the same as illegal and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.David Sundar Singh for R1 & R2 :Mr.M.Jagadeesh Pandian for R3