VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Haridoss v. The Superintending

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 8566/2017

Judgment

O R D E R

This writ petition was filed for a Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to provide electricity service connection to the petitioner's shop situated in S.F.No.1046/39, Pamban Village, Ramanathapuram District, by considering his representation dated 21.04.2017.

2.Today(14.06.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits pending this writ petition, the electricity service connection has been provided to the petitioner and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶3Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

14.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. vrn To

1.The Chairman of Registration Department, Department of Registration Office, Santhome Beach Road, Chennai – 600 028.

2.The Assistant Chairman of Registration Department, Combined Registration Office Campus, Uthangudi, Madurai.

3.The Sub Registrar, (Stand by District Registrar Seat), Uthangudi, Madurai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn

14.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Haridoss ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, (TANGEDCO) Rameswaram Salai,Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Assistant Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, (TANGEDCO), Mandabam,Ramanathapuram District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to provide Electricity connection to the petitioner's shop situated in Ramanathapuram District, Pamban Village S.F.No.1046/39 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthick Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadayalan Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.