Muthulakshmi, v. The District Collector

ORDER The petitioner, seeking old age pension, has made a representation to the respondents and alleging that the said representation has not been considered, she has filed this writ petition.

2.There is no representation for the petitioner.

3.Learned Additional Government Pleader produced a copy of the proceedings dated 23.06.2017 and submitted that the petitioner's representation was considered and Old Age Pension was also sanctioned to her.

4.Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Index :

07.06.2023 NCC : Internet : gk To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District.

2.The Tahsildar, Old Age Pension Scheme, Taluk Office, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

07.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Muthulakshmi ... Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Old Age Pension Scheme, Taluk Office, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide financial aid to the petitioner under Old Age Pension Scheme by considering the petitioner's application dated 19.12.2016 and 31.01.2017. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader *****