VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Rengaraj v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 21759/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner with a grievance that his application submitted before the respondents for cancellation of the patta granted in favour of the 5th respondent is not considered so far, has filed this writ petition.

2.When the writ petition has been taken up for hearing the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner's application is under consideration and necessary orders would be passed.

3.In view of the above submission this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity to the interested parties.

4.The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

07.09.2023 Internet : Yes/ No Index : Yes/ No NCC : Yes/ No dsk To

1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Karur District, Karur.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kulithalai, Karur District.

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kulithalai, Karur District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

07.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Rengaraj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Karur District, Karur. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kulithalai, Karur District. 4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kulithalai, Karur District. 5.Krihnamoorthy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3, particularly the 3rd respondent to cancel the patta No.4840 issued in the name of the 5th respondent by the 4th respondent in respect of the petitioner's family property of bearing S.No.688/2A – an extent of 2 hectares 65.5 Ares, situated at Rachandar Thirumalai Villge, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District and issue separate Patta in their name. For petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondent : Ms.D.Farjana Ghousia, Nos.1 to 4 Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.