I.Bharathi v. The Principal Secretary

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing this writ petition, nothing requires for adjudication in the present writ petition.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In view of the above factual position, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

30.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

3.The Assistant Director of Survey/ Personal Assistant to District Collector (Survey), District Survey Office, Sivagangai. W.P.(MD)oNo.1335oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.1335oofo2016 Datedo:o30.08.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) No.1115 of 2016 I.Bharathi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3.The Assistant Director of Survey/ Personal Assistant to District Collector (Survey), District Survey Office, Sivagangai. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.Aa1/7094/2015 dated 31.12.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to conduct the maintenance of Survey Records Test as per the seniority list published by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.A2/11075/2014-1 dated 28.07.2015 and promote the petitioner to the post of Deputy Tahsildar in Sivaganga District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader