M. Kannusamy, v. The District Collector

ORDER The petitioner with a grievance that the quarry operation of the 4th respondent is causing nuisance to his agricultural crops has filed this writ petition in the year 2016 for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pay compensation for the loss incurred by this petitioner due to the quarry operation of the 4th respondent.

2.It is reported by the learned Counsel on either side that the issue has been amicably solved by the 4th respondent and the petitioner and the 4th respondent has stopped the quarry operation.

3.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

09.10.2023 To

1.The District Collector, Trichy.

2.The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining, Trichy.

3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai, Trichy.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

09.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Kannusamy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Trichy. 2.The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining, Trichy. 3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai, Trichy. 4.M/s.Fathima Granite, Represented by the Managing Director, Farathipa. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action for the disbursement of compensation for the loss incurred by the petitioner in the hands of the 4th respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 21.05.2021 and consequential proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 03.04.2016 besides directing to take necessary action against the 4th respondent, within a time frame fixed by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.B.Prahalad Ravi For Respondent : Mr.M.Ramesh Nos.1 to 3 Government Advocate For Respondent : No representation No.4