- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 October 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13397/2016
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
06.10.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The Superintending Engineer, Madurai Region, K.Pudur, Madurai.
¶2The Executive Engineer, O/o. The Executive Engineer, Arasaradi West, Madurai.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
¶3The Assistant Executive Engineer, O/o. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Pasumalai,
¶4The Assistant Engineer, O/o. The Assistant Engineer, TVS Nagar,
¶5The Tahsildar, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Madurai District.
06.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10025 and 10026 of 2016 P.Mukesh ... Petitioner versus 1. The Superintending Engineer, Madurai Region, K.Pudur, Madurai. 2. The Executive Engineer, O/o. The Executive Engineer, Arasaradi West, 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, O/o. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Pasumalai, 4. The Assistant Engineer, O/o. The Assistant Engineer, TVS Nagar, 5. P.Virumandi 6. The Tahsildar, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent in Letter No.UMiPo/Pa/TVS Nagar/Ko.Kattu/A.No.430/2015 dated 05.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 4 to grant electricity service connection to the petitioner's property in Old Survey No.472/1, presently Town Survey Ward No.XXII, T.S.No.178 at Madakulam Village, Muthuramalingapuram, Pykara, Madurai Town. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel For R5 : Mr.S.Rajasekar For R6 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.