M.Palanisamy v. The District Collector

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

27.04.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, Karur, Karur District.

¶2The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

27.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10034 and 11297 of 2016 M.Palanisamy ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Karur, Karur District. 2. The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur. 3. Rajmohan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned patta No.2223 dated Nil in respect of the property located in S.F.No.232/1, 232/2, 232/3, 232/4, 232/5 and 232/6 at Thennilai East Village, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to restore the patta. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pandia Rajan For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sarangam, Additional Govt. Pleader For R3 : Mr.AN.Ramanathan