- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13502/2016
Judgment
O R D E R Mr.T.A.Ebenezer, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that he intends to withdraw this Writ Petition as per the instruction of his client and sought permission.
¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.
¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
¶4No costs.
¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.07.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,
1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai – 6.
¶3The District Educational Officer, Dindigul – 624 001 Dindigul -624 005.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.13502 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.10085 of 2016
28.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.13502 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.10085 of 2016 R.Manivel ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai – 6. 3. The District Educational Officer, Dindigul – 624 001 Dindigul -624 005. 4.The Correspondent, C.S.M.A. Higher Sec.School, Ma.Mu.Kovilur, Dindigul – 624 005. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.2510/ A3/2016 dated 25.05.2016 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to sanction the third incentive increment for possessing the qualification of M.Phil to the petitioner within the stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For R1 to R3 : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.