T.Ramakrishnan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2What is under challenge in this writ petition is the order granting approval for the appointment of the fifth respondent as Secretary of the Educational Institution. The period was up to 31.12.2016. The said period has long since expired. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication.

¶3At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he is questioning the very foundational premises on which the approval was granted.

¶4I make it clear I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The petitioner can canvas all the contentions raised in this writ petition in W.P(MD)No.19499 of 2016.

¶5This writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Director of Elementary Education, Directorate of School Education Department, College Road, Chennai – 6.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

3.The District Elementary Education Officer, District Elementary Education Office, Palani Road, Dindigul,

4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Assistant Elementary Educational Office, Palani Road, Dindigul Urban, and W.M.P(MD)Nos.10093 & 12733 of 2015

16.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.10093 & 12733 of 2015 T.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State represented by The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director of Elementary Education, Directorate of School Education Department, College Road, Chennai – 6. 3.The District Elementary Education Officer, District Elementary Education Office, Palani Road, Dindigul, 4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Assistant Elementary Educational Office, Palani Road, Dindigul Urban, 5.T.Namperumal 6.N.K.Sesharamakrishnan 7.N.Sesha Thiruvenkadam ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No. 1082/Aa3/2016 dated 12.07.2016 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohammed Suhail for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.4 Mr.N.Dilip Kumar for R.5 to R.7