- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 August 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13620/2016
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he intends to withdraw this Writ Petition as per the instruction of his client and sought permission.
¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.
¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
¶4No costs.
¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.08.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,
¶1The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Industries, St. George Fort, Chennai – 9.
¶2The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadur, Department of Transport, St.George fort, Chennai – 9.
¶3The Managing Director of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam Division, Kumbakonam.
¶4The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Karaikudi Region, (Kumbakonam Division) Karaikudi.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.13620 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.10159 of 2016
16.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.13620 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.10159 of 2016 Arunagiri ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Industries, St. George Fort, Chennai – 9. 2. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Transport, St.George Fort, Chennai – 9. 3. The Managing Director of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam Division, Kumbakonam. 4. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Karaikudi Region, (Kumbakonam Division) Karaikudi. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his letter No.17913/C1/2015 dated 01.03.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's claim to the post of Junior Assistant, in the light of the G.O.Ms.No.59 Industries (MIF.2) Department dated 20.02.1997 with all monitory benefits within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.A. Kannan For Respondents : Mr.D. Sivaraman
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.