- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22438/2021
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that after the Writ Petition was filed, the grievance of the petitioner was redressed and the information sought for in the application dated
20.11.2020 was also furnished to the petitioner.
¶2Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
21.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb To
1.The Commissioner/ Public Information Officer, Madurai Corporation, Madurai-625 002.
2.The Appellate Authority (R.T.I. Act), No.2, Thiagaraya Salai, Teynampet, Near Aalai Ammal Koil, Chennai-600 018. W.P.(MD)oNo.22438oofo2021 N.oANANDoVENKATESH,oJ. ssb W.P.(MD)oNo.22438oofo2021 Datedo:o21.11.2023 Pageo4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH K.P.R.Singaravel .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner/ Public Information Officer, Madurai Corporation, Madurai-625 002. 2.The Appellate Authority (R.T.I. Act), No.2, Thiagaraya Salai, Teynampet, Near Aalai Ammal Koil, Chennai-600 018. 3.P.Arumugam 4.K.P.R.Dhanuskodi .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to furnish information sought for in the petitioner's application dated 20.11.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar Srinivasan For R1 : Ms.Devasena Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.K.K.Senthil Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.R.Narayanan For R4 : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.