- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 December 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22426/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
21.12.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.
2.The District Registrar ( Administration), Madurai South District,
3.The Joint Sub Registrar No.1, Office of the Sub Registration (South) Madurai City,
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
21.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).No.18968 of 2021 K.Jothi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028. 2.The District Registrar ( Administration), Madurai South District, 3.The National Highways Authority of India, Represented by the Revenue Tahsildar, Madurai. 4.The Joint Sub Registrar No.1, Office of the Sub Registration (South) Madurai City, 5.S.Nova Santhosh College of Physiotherapy, D.No.15, GST Road, Thirumangalam Main Road, Thanakkankulam Village, Thirupparankundram Taluk, 6.V.Paulraj ... Respondents (Respondent No.3 is suo motu impleaded and R-3 to R-5 rank reassigned as R-4 to R-6 vide Order of this Court dated 17.12.2021) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 5456/Aa2/2021 dated 22.11.2021 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently forbearing the respondents from in any manner making any entry in the objection book maintained in 3rd respondent office based on the objections raised by the 4th and 5th respondents. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Gangai Amaran For R-1, R-2 & R-4 : Ms.D.Farjana Ghoushia, Special Government Pleader For R-3 : Ms.J.Padmavathi Devi, Standing Counsel For R-5 & R-6 : Mr.P.Balamurugan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.