Ramamoorthy, S/O.Aranga Konar v. District Collector,

O R D E R When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has already circulated a letter dated 17.10.2023, to the Registry for withdrawal of the case, based on the instructions given by the petitioner.

¶2Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

20.10.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssb To

1.The District Collector, Pudukottai.

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Pudukottai.

3.The Director of Survey and Settlement and Land Records, Chepauk, Chennai.

4.The Assistant Settlement Officer (South), Chepauk, Chennai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb

20.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:20.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Ramamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Pudukottai. 2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Pudukottai. 3.The Director of Survey and Settlement and Land Records, Chepauk, Chennai. 4.The Assistant Settlement Officer (South), Chepauk, Chennai. ...Respondents (*R3 and R4 are impleaded vide order dated 28.02.2023 made in W.M.P(MD).No.2418 of 2017 in W.P(MD).No.14868 of 2016*) PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2016 within a particular time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.N.C.Ashok Kumar For Respondent : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate