G.Radhakrishnan v. The Additional Director

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has challenged the charge memo, subsequently, the respondents have completed disciplinary proceedings and exonerated the petitioner from the charges. The submission is recorded.

¶2In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No

05.06.2023 Internet : Yes

ksa To

1.The Additional Director General of Police/ Inspector General of Prison, CMDA Tower II, No.I Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai.

¶2The Superintendent of Prison, District Jail and Borstal School, Pudukkottai. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa

05.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P(MD)No. 10999 of 2016 G.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Director General of Police/ Inspector General of Prison, CMDA Tower II, No.I Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai. 2. The Superintendent of Prison, District Jail and Borstal School, Pudukkottai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader