- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 October 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 23104/2023
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by four petitioners contending that they were initially appointed as Social Forestry Watcher in the Forest Department in the year 1986 on a daily wage basis and their services were subsequently regularised in the post of Plot Watcher by an order of the second respondent, dated 31.08.2009 with effect from 07.08.2009. All the petitioners had attained superannuation on different dates as detailed below: Name Date of appointment as daily wage Seniority number Date of Regularization Date of retirement V.Loganathan
01.10.1986 4842
07.08.2009
28.02.2022 P.Sangu
01.12.1982 2297
10.07.2007
29.02.2016 M.K.Subramaniyan
11.01.1983 3083
07.08.2009
30.04.2022 M.Kalimuthu
01.08.1983 1793
07.08.2007
31.12.2019
¶2The Government of Tamil Nadu has issued G.O(Ms)No.95 of the Environment and Forest (F-2) Department, dated 07.08.2009, wherein the Plot Watchers have been regularised. After attaining superannuation, another set of Plot Watchers had approached this Court by filing a writ petition in W.P.No. 19023 of 2021 seeking a Mandamus to regularise their services from the date of initial appointment as Plot Watchers for the purpose of getting pension and all other consequential benefits. The said writ petition was allowed by this Court on 09.09.2021. Another set of 14 similarly placed persons have filed W.P.No. 21627 of 2021 seeking a similar relief. The said writ petition was allowed by this Court on 07.10.2021. In compliance with the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.21627 of 2021, the Government of Tamil Nadu in G.O(2D)No.127 Environment, Climate Change and Forest (FR.2ii) Department, dated
03.06.2023 has passed a Government order regularising the services of those petitioners from the date of their initial appointment.
¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents pointed out that as per Clause 9 of the said Government order it should not be cited as a precedent in future.
¶4The four petitioners in the present writ petition are also similarly placed and their services may also be regularised from the date of their initial appointment, so that, the said services would be calculated for the purposes of pension.
¶5I have carefully considered the submissions made on either side.
¶6A perusal of the orders of this Court in W.P.No.19023 of 2021, dated
09.09.2021 and W.P.No.21627 of 2021, dated 07.10.2021 would clearly reveal that the petitioners in those writ petitions are similarly placed to the petitioners in the present writ petition. In view of the above said facts, this Court is inclined to allow the present writ petition and direct the respondents herein to regularize the services of the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment as Plot Watchers for the purpose of getting pension, family pension and all other consequential benefits. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7This writ petition stands allowed to the extent as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs.
06.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To
1.The Secretary to Government, The Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance (Pension) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Building, Chennai-15.
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
BTR
06.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR 1.V.Loganathan 2.P.Sangu 3.M.K.Subramanian 4.M.Kalimuthu ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Finance (Pension) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Building, Chennai-15. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to regularize the service of petitioners after completion of ten years from date of initial appointment as a Plot Watcher on daily wage basis for the purpose of getting pension and family pension in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment delivered in C.A.No.6789 of 2019, dated 02.09.2019 confer all consequential pensionary benefits by the way of considering our joint representation to the respondents, dated 28.06.2023. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.