VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Rajangam, S/O.Late Arasan v. The General Manager,

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 15386/2016

Judgment

O R D E R At the hearing on 15.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.15386 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.

(MD).Nos.11331 and 11332 of 2016 are closed.

20.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Marketing Division) Indian Oil Bhavan, IV Level, 139, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034.

2.The Chief Area Manager, Indane Area Office, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 2, Race Course Road, Chockkikulam, Madurai 625 002. W.P.(Mi)No.15386oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.15386oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.11331o&o11332oofo2016

20.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :20.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.11331 & 11332 of 2016 A.Rajangam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Marketing Division) Indian Oil Bhavan, IV Level, 139, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. 2.The Chief Area Manager, Indane Area Office, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 2, Race Course Road, Chockkikulam, Madurai 625 002. 3.Sekaran ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order No.Nil dated 13.07.2016 passed by the second respondent declaring the third respondent as to allottee for the LPG (Indane Gas) Distributorship at Aundipatti, Theni District and to quash the same. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.K.Muraleedharan for R1 and R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.