- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 August 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15409/2016
Judgment
O R D E R Mrs.M.Parameshwari, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.
¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
¶4No costs.
¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
16.08.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,
¶1The Chief Education Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
¶2The District Education Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.15409 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.11347 & 11348 of 2016
16.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.15409 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.11347 & 11348 of 2016 1. P. Athisayam 2. S. Reena Mary 3. Alice Geetha 4. P. Valliammal 5. A. Vimala Devi 6. M.Sundararaj 7. R.Edison 8. A. Arul Stephen 9. C. Rajkumar 10. N. Selvakumar 11. G. Jayaseelan 12. V. Selvaraj 13. J. Jebarani 14. J. Mariyapredeeparani 15. R. Shinola Jeba Kumari 16. T. Jein Thavamani 17. S.Elizabeth Rani 18. V. Pushpa Thres 19. G.Epsibah Nalini 20. A. Caroline Anbumary 21. S. Roselin Mary 22. Daphne Christena 23. T. Mercy Rita 24. G.D. Jerry 25. P. Dhandapani 26. K. Duraisamy 27. K. Rajaram 28. N. Rosilin Mary ...Petitioners / Petitioners Vs. 1. The Chief Education Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The District Education Officer, Palani, Dindigul District. 3. C. Kezi Selva Vijila Principal Christian Engineering College, Oddanchatiram. ... Respondents/Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.3669/A2/2015 dated 06.07.2016 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to conduct proper enquiry after giving proper opportunity to the petitioners and after the final report of the Fee Determination Committee. For Petitioners : Mrs. M. Parameswari For R1 to R2 : Mr.V. Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.