VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sengodan v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 September 2023
Bench
D.Nagarjunauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 16278/2023

Judgment

O RDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he has already circulated a letter dated

11.09.2023 to the Registry for withdrawal of the case, based on the instructions given by the petitioners.

¶2Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Index : Yes/No

13.09.2023 Internet : Yes/No ssb To

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Trichy District , Tiruchirapalli.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Thathaiyangarpet Police Station, Trichy.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. DR.D.NAGARJUN. J.

ssb

21.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.16278 of 2023 1.Sengodan 2.Rajesh 3.Rajavel ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Trichy District , Tiruchirapalli. 2.The State, Rep. By Sub-Inspector of Police, Thathaiyangarpet Police Station, Trichy. 3.Chandrasekar ..Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the learned First Additional Sessions Court for Trial of Cases under SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Trichy to consider the petitioners bail application and dispose the bail application on the same day, if the petitioners surrender before the learned First Additional Sessions Court for trial of Cases under SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Trichy in Crime No.181 of 2023 on the file of the respondents. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Indu Priya For R1 and R2 : Mr. E.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.