M.Chandramohan, v. The Director of Elementary

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 16.08.2023, the 2nd respondent passed order rejecting the claim of the petitioner to step up his pay on par with his junior, who is the 4th respondent.

¶2In view of the above, the petitioner has to challenge the order passed by the 2nd respondent at present.

¶3In my considered view, nothing survives in this writ petition.

4.1. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

4.2. No costs.

17.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-6.

2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District. W.P.(MD)oNo.15547oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.15547oofo2016 Datedo:o17.08.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND M.Chandramohan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-6. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District. 4.M.Anbu Kulanthai Raj, B.T. Headmaster, Panchayat Union Middle School, Konapatti, Sanarpatti Union, Dindigul District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to step up the pay of the petitioner equivalent to the 4th respondent from the date when the 4th respondent started drawing higher pay than the petitioner herein on the basis of the representations of the petitioner dated 12.09.2015 and 08.07.2016 and to pay arrears accordingly with all other benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Saravanan For RR1 to 3 : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate