S.Jeyakumar v. The District Collector

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing of this writ petition, this writ petition has become infructuous and sought to pass appropriate order.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

3.1. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3.2. No costs.

3.3. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni. W.P.(MD)oNo.15590oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.15590oofo2016 Datedo:o16.08.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.11456 to 11458 of 2016 S.Jeyakumar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of transfer in Na.Ka.No.A2/04/2016, dated 10.08.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal to the extent of transferring the petitioner from the office of the Special Tahsildar (Adidravidar Welfare), Theni to the office of the Special Tahsildar, Sipcot Unit-3, Bodinayakkanur at Theni and consequently to direct the respondents to post the petitioner in an Executive Post of Special Revenue Inspector involving no desk work within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karthik For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader