Kumar v. The Chairman Cum District

ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner represented that already the main case itself was closed and the petition has become infructuous.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor also admitted that the main case itself was closed and thereby nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition.

¶3In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

14.07.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No aav To

¶1The Chairman cum District Collector District level Vigilance and Monitoring Committee Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli

¶2The Commissioner of Police Tirunelveli City Tirunelveli District

¶3The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli

¶4The Assistant Commissioner of Police (L&O) Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District

¶5The Assistant Commissioner of Police (L&O) Tirunelveli Town Tirunelveli District

¶6The Inspector of Police Palayamkottai Police Station, Palayamkottai Tirunelveli District

¶7The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

P.DHANABAL, J. aav W.P(MD)No.22728 of 2018

14.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :14.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.22728 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD) No.20618 of 2018 1. Kumar 2. Rakesh Kumar 3. Augustine ... Petitioners -Vs- 1. The Chairman cum District Collector District level Vigilance and Monitoring Committee Tirunelveli District Tirunelveli 2. The Commissioner of Police Tirunelveli City Tirunelveli District 3. The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police (L&O) Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police (L&O) Tirunelveli Town Tirunelveli District 6. The Inspector of Police Palayamkottai Police Station, Palayamkottai Tirunelveli District ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent No.1 in Na.Ka.A2/18159/2015 dated 29.9.2018 and to quash the same so far as relating the case (in serial No.3) in crime No. 984 of 2017 of Palayamkottai Police Station and consequently direct the respondent No.5 herein not to harass the petitioners on the pretext of enquiry in the said case in crime No.984 of 2017 on the file of Palayamkottai Police Station. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondents : Mr. R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor