D. Gnana Theeba Rani, v. Raman

O R D E R The first respondent has passed proceedings dated 27.09.2023 rejecting the proposal of the management. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the first respondent has reiterated the very same reasons contained in the order dated 29.07.2022 which was set aside by this Court.

2.Be that as it may, when a direction for passing an appropriate order alone was issued by me, it may not be proper for me to go into the merits in contempt jurisdiction. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the impugned order dated 27.09.2023.

3.With this liberty to the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.

04.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.Raman, The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District.

2.Emperumal,, The District Educational Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.1816 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.21742 of 2022

04.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1816 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.21742 of 2022 D.Gnana Theeba Rani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Raman, The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District. 2.Emperumal,, The District Educational Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for willful deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD). No.21742 of 2022 dated 30.11.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Paneer Selvam For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Spl. Government Pleader.