- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15811/2016
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner has submitted a representation before the first respondent seeking water connection and thereafter, filed this writ petition in the year 2016.
2.Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the service connection has been effected and as such, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
3.Recording the aforesaid submission made by the petitioner's Counsel, this writ petition is closed as no further order is required to be passed. No costs. Index :
22.06.2023 NCC : gk
B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk
22.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI V.Murugan ... Petitioner v. 1.The Commissioner, Thoothukudi Corporation, Thoothukudi. 2.Mariammal 3.V.Narayanan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant water connection for the property bearing Door No.59, Ponnagaram (Property Tax Assessment No.8269) Ward No.8, Thoothukudi. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : No appearance *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.