VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Madurai District Inland v. The Commissioner of Fisheries

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16222/2016

Judgment

O R D E R On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.16222 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P(MD).Nos.11868 to 11870 of 2016 are closed.

24.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No ssb To

1.The Commissioner of Fisheries, O/o.The Commissioner of Fisheries, Chennai-6.

2.The Assistant Director of Fisheries (Inland Fisheries), Fisheries Department, Pechiamman Padithurai, Madurai-625 001.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. ssb

24.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P(MD).Nos.11868 to 11870 of 2016 Madurai District Inland Fishermen Co-operative Federation Limited, Rep.by its President, A.Selvaraj, S/o.Agni Ambalam, Kodikulam Post and Village, Agriculture College Via, Madurai North, Madurai District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Fisheries, O/o.The Commissioner of Fisheries, Chennai-6. 2.The Assistant Director of Fisheries (Inland Fisheries), Fisheries Department, Pechiamman Padithurai, Madurai-625 001. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.604/E/2016 on the file of the respondent No.2 dated 14.06.2016 and the consequential impugned order in Na.Ka.No.604/E/2016 on the file of the second respondent dated 18.08.2016 and quash the same as illegal and for a consequential direction, forbearing the respondents from conducting Tender/Public Auction in respect of fishing rights Lease in Madurai, Theni and Dindigul Districts without following the procedure contemplated in RSO 211 of Revenue Standing Order. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.