- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 March 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- CMA(MD) 379/2017
Judgment
J U D G M E N T According to the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the matter has become infructuous. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
29.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To
¶1The District Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil.
¶2The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi C.M.A.(MD)No.379 of 2017
29.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.M.A(MD)No.379 of 2017 I.Eugeine ..... Appellant/ Respondent -vs- M.Adline Jini .... Respondent /Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, against the fair and executable order dated 29.04.2016, passed in I.D.O.P.No.47 of 2013, on the file of the District Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil. For Appellant : Mr.J.Barathan For Respondent : M/s.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya for Mr.G.Aravindan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.