VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Balaji, S/O.N.Subburaj v. The Gandhigram Institute of

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16468/2016

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.C.Jegannathan, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments after filing this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

24.07.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No RM

BATTU DEVANAND, J. rm

24.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P(MD)No.12029 of 2016 S.Balaji ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health & Family Welfare Trust, Rep. by its Chairman, Soundaram Nagar, Gandhigram Post, Dindigul District - 624 302. 2.The Director In-Charge The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health & Family Welfare Trust, Soundaram Nagar, Gandhigram Post, Dindigul District - 624 302. 3.S.Seethalakshmi Director In-Charge, The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health & Family Welfare Trust, Soundaram Nagar, Gandhigram Post, Dindigul District - 624 302. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings issued by the second respondent in Ref.No.GIRH/Estt/2016-17/0461 dated 22.08.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to allow the petitioner to stay in his present quarter viz. 195/1-B2 Ambathurai, Dindigul. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jegannathan for M/s.Veera Associates For Respondents : Mr.V.Vijayashankar - for R1 & R2 Mr.R.Murali - for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.