Arul Jose Kennady v. Marry Bindu

J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the appellant is not ready to argue the matter. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

17.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

¶2The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi C.M.A.(MD)No.473 of 2017

17.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.M.A(MD)No.473 of 2017 Arul Jose Kennady ..... Appellant/ Respondent -vs- Marry Bindu ... Respondent / Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 55 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, as against the fair and decretal order dated 18.03.2017 made in D.O.P.No.488 of 2015 by dismissing the D.O.P setting the appellant ex-parte filed by the respondent herein under Sections 10(1) (x) of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, to dissolve the marriage between the petitioner and respondent solemnized on 10.05.2000 passed by the learned District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. For Appellant : Mr.J.Sankara Pandian For Respondent : No appearance