- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 March 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16637/2016
Judgment
O R D E R At the hearing on 16.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.
¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.16637 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs.
30.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To
1.The General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, No.16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai.
2.The Branch Manager, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., Anjugramam Branch, Anjugramam, Kanyakumari District.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. sbn W.P.(MD)No.16
637 of 2016
30.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY L.Ebenesar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, No.16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai. 2.The Branch Manager, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., Anjugramam Branch, Anjugramam, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to sanction the education loan to the petitioner for a sum of Rs.70,600/- for the academic year 2016-2017, 2017-2018 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.08.2016. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Tapal Due for R1 :No appearance for R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.