Chellam v. The District Collector

ORDER The petitioner has submitted a representation on 15.02.2016 and filed this writ petition for a mandamus directing the second respondent to consider his representation.

2.By the said representation, the petitioner has requested the respondents to recognize the encroachment of this petitioner by issuing B-memo.

3.Learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that three survey numbers are mentioned in the petitioner's representation, of which, S.Nos.29/1 & 22 are water bodies and S.No.28/1A belongs to a private person.

4.In view of the representation made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition is dismissed that this petitioner is not having any right for the relief sought for. No costs. Index :

12.10.2023 NCC : Internet : gk To

1.The District Collector, O/o.District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Kamuthakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

12.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Chellam .. Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, O/o.District Collector, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Village Administrative Officer, Kamuthakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.02.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader *****