P.Rajkumar v. The District Collector

ORDER The petitioner, with a grievance that the property tax has not been mutated in his name, has made a representation and has filed this writ petition.

2.When the writ petition came up for hearing today, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's name has been mutated in the property tax documents and nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. Therefore, he sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3.In view of the above position, this writ petition is closed as no further order is required to be passed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index :

12.10.2023 NCC : Internet : gk To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Block Development Officer, Aruppukottai (Village Panchayat), Virudhunagar District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

12.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.12396 of 2016 P.Rajkumar .. Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Aruppukottai (Village Panchayat), Virudhunagar District. 4.U.Rajathi .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate legal action as against the fourth respondent based on the representation of the petitioner dated 09.08.2016, 27.06.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate for R.1 to R.3 No appearance for R.4 *****