Chandra Vasikaran, v. The District Revenue Officer,

O R D E R Both learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the fourth respondent submit that the dispute between these private parties was settled pursuant to the institution of a suit between them. Consequently, it is stated that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

¶2In view thereof, W.P.(MD).No.17143 of 2016 is disposed of without any order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.(MD).No.12426 of 2016 is closed.

31.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Office, Tirunelveli.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. W.P.(Mi)No.17143oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.17143oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).No.12426oofo2016

31.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :31.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.12426 of 2016 Chandra Vasikaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Office, Tirunelveli. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 4.Johnson Gnanadurai ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in rP.k.fh2/8/2011 dated 30.04.2015 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the first respondent herein to restore the petitioner name in respect of property in Survey No.447/6 at Thottakudi Village, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner :Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 :Mr.T.Selvan for R4