VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

T.Gita, v. The Secretary to the

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 February 2023
Bench
D. Krishnakumarauthor, R.Vijayakumar
Case no.
WP(MD) 17760/2016

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.) When the writ petition came up for hearing on 01.02.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. [D.K.K.,J.] [R.V.,J.]

06.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps To

1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.

3.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ellis Nagar, Madurai – 625 016.

4.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. W.P(MD)No.17760eofe2016 D. KRISHNAKUMAR ,J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ps DATED : 06.02.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.02.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)Nos.12805 & 12806 of 2016 T.Gita ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 3.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ellis Nagar, Madurai – 625 016. 4.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 5.Balakrishnan 6.Ramachandren 7.Kalai Raja 8.A.Kadhar Mohidheen ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary steps to remove the encroachment put up in the vacant site, measuring an extent of 136.66 sq. feet situated on Northern side of Flats H-662, H-666, H-670 of Sri Ram Apartments, Ellis Nagar, Madurai by the 8th respondent according to law. For Petitioner : Mr.Y.Krishnan (No appearance) For R – 1 : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader For RR 2 & 3 : Mr.R.Sivakumar Standing Counsel For R – 3 : Mr.S.Nagarajan For R – 4 : Mr.R.Murali For RR 5 to 7 : Mr.N.Sathish Babu

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.