- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 April 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 17918/2016
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 20.04.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial), for withdrawing this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2Based on the letter dated 20.04.2023, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
21.04.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
¶2The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
21.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Marichamy ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Thirumangalam, Madurai District. 3. Sangumani ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to take appropriate action as against the 3rd respondent by refusing to re-handover the petitioner's house built up in Patta No.322 in Maikudi Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District to the petitioner, based on his representation dated 27.06.2016 made to the first respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.