- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 September 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18103/2016
Judgment
O R D E R On 11.07.2023 there is no representation for the petitioner. On
25.07.2023, it is represented across the Bench that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. Accordingly, Registry is directed to issue notice to the petitioner. The Registry issued notice to the petitioner through a registered post, but as per the Postal Department endorsement dated 02.08.2023, it is refused by the addressee.
¶2Considering the endorsement of the Postal Department, the Registry is directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list today i.e., on 13.09.2023.
¶3Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case.
¶4Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶5No costs.
¶6Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
13.09.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No rm To The Labour Officer, Social Security Scheme, Labour Office, Madurai. W.oP.o(MD)oNo.18103oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. RM W.P.o(MD)oNo.18103oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD)oNo.13056oofo2016
13.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P. (MD) No.18103 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD) No.13056 of 2016 M. Thonthi ...Petitioner Vs. The Labour Officer, Social Security Scheme, Labour Office, Madurai. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.16789/10, dated 18.08.2015, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to grant pension to the petitioner. For Petitioner : No Appearance (Party-in-person) For Respondent : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.