A.Sheik Oli v. District Revenue Officer

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing this writ petition, nothing requires for adjudication in the present writ petition and sought to pass necessary orders.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In view of the above factual position, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

17.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni. W.P.(MD)oNo.18440oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.18440oofo2016 Datedo:o17.08.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) No.13294 of 2016 A.Sheik Oli .. Petitioner Vs. District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in pursuant to the impugned order of suspension passed by him in his proceedings in Roc.No. A5/26857/2014 dated 20.08.2014 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the Petitioner in service withal service and monetary benefits in the light of the judgement passed by the Hon'ble Apex court in Ajaykumar Chowdhary vs. Union of India within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondent : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader