K.V.Nataraj, v. The District Collector

O R D E R On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.18441 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs.

28.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No ssb To

1.The District Collector,

2.The Sub Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

3.The Municipal Commissioner, Palani Municipality,

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. ssb

28.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY K.V.Nataraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, 2.The Sub Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District. 3.The Municipal Commissioner, Palani Municipality, ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2016 received by them on 02.09.2016 to rectify the defects of width of the road as 11.2 meters instead of 13.6 meters on the northwest corner situated at Ward No.4, Block No.19 in New Town Survey No.31 situated at Palani Town. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents :Mr.C.Baskaran Government Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.G.Arjunan for R3