VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Subulakshmi, v. The Joint Commissioner

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 August 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 25385/2018

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned notice, dated

13.12.2018 and seeking consequential direction to the respondent to survey and measure the extent and fix the rent in accordance with law.

¶2There is no appearance on the side of the petitioner. Heard Mr.V.Chandrasekar, the Learned counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the material documents available on record.

¶3The Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted it is only a Notice under Section 106 of the HR & CE Act. But on perusal of the said alleged notice it is seen that the respondents have directed the petitioner to vacate the premises.

¶4This Court is of the considered opinion that even an encroacher is entitled to show cause notice. Therefore the petitioner is directed to treat the alleged notice as show cause notice and the petitioner shall submit explanation to the said show cause notice. The respondent shall also grant personal hearing to the petitioner. Thereafter the respondent shall consider in accordance to law and pass orders.

¶5With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. Index : Yes / No

28.08.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No

ksa To The Joint Commissioner Executive Officer, Arulmighu Subramaniasamy Thirukkovil, Tirupparakundram, Madurai District. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 25385 of 2018

28.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 25385 of 2018 Subulakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. The Joint Commissioner Executive Officer, Arulmighu Subramaniasamy Thirukkovil, Tirupparakundram, Madurai District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka. No.1373/2018/E5 dated 13.12.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to survey and measure the extents and fix the rent in accordance with law. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.V.Chandrasekar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.